Papers with LLM-generated reasoning
Evaluating Legal Reasoning Traces with Legal Issue Tree Rubrics (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Evaluating the quality of LLM-generated reasoning traces in expert domains is essential for ensuring credibility and explainability, yet remains challenging due to the inherent complexity of such reasoning tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale legal reasoning dataset with an emphasis on reasoning trace evaluation that converts court judgments into hierarchical trees of opposing parties’ arguments and the court’s conclusions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves the quality of LLM-generated reasoning traces in legal domains, whereas RL improves correctness albeit with reduced coverage. |
CoT-RAG: Integrating Chain of Thought and Retrieval-Augmented Generation to Enhance Reasoning in Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Feiyang Li, Peng Fang, Zhan Shi, Arijit Khan, Fang Wang, Weihao Wang, null Zhangxin-hw, Cui Yongjian
| Challenge: | Chain-of-thought reasoning has two key limitations: lack of reliability when solely relying on LLM-generated reasoning chains and interference from natural language reasoning steps with the models’ inference logic. |
| Approach: | They propose a chain-of-thought reasoning framework with three key designs to address these issues. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves the performance of large language models on complex tasks by incorporating knowledge graphs and learnable knowledge case-aware RAG. |
Does Reasoning Introduce Bias? A Study of Social Bias Evaluation and Mitigation in LLM Reasoning (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have enabled automatic generation of chain-of-thought reasoning . however, when reasoning steps reflect social stereotypes, they can reinforce harmful associations and lead to misleading conclusions. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that detects how model predictions change across incremental reasoning steps. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms a stereotype-free baseline and improves accuracy. |